Note
-
M. Abreu e V. Grinevich, The Nature of Academic Entrepreneurship in the U.K.: Widening the Focus on Entrepreneurial Activities, in «Research Policy», 42, 2, 2013, pp. 408-422; D.B. Audretsch, E.E. Lehmann, M. Menter e K. Wirsching, Intrapreneurship and Absorptive Capacities: The Dynamic Effect of Labor Mobility, in «Technovation», 99, 102129, 2021.
-
B. Youssef, A. Boubaker, B. Dedaj e M. Carabregu-Vokshi, Digitalization of the Economy and Entrepreneurship Intention, in«Technological Forecasting and Social Change», vol. 164(C), 120043, 2021.
-
D. Bienkowska, M. Klofsten e E. Rasmussen, PhD Students in the Entrepreneurial University‐perceived Support for Academic Entrepreneurship, in «European Journal of Education», 51, 1, 2016, pp. 56-72.
-
La ricerca nelle discipline umanistiche è in genere divulgata tramite libri e conferenze mentre la ricerca nelle scienze sociali è rivolta frequentemente al settore pubblico e al terzo settore. Pertanto, le attività esterne assumono principalmente la forma di consulenza e convenzioni in conto terzi.
-
Abreu e Grinevich, The Nature of Academic Entrepreneurship in the UK, cit.; l’ormai vasta letteratura sull’imprenditorialità accademica studia i fattori che favoriscono la commercializzazione di un numero ristretto di attività che sono relativamente visibili e quantificabili, il cui impatto economico può essere stimato con relativa facilità diversamente da quanto accade per le attività più informali che non trovano immediata espressione in valori di mercato.
-
All’interno della stessa posizione dal punto di vista statistico, gli effetti causali variano anche in relazione alla variazione casuale delle condizioni nel tempo; cfr. M. Rosenzweig e C. Udry, Evidence Validity in a Stochastic World, NBER Working Paper, 2016; S. Chassang, G. Padró i Miquel e E. Snowberg, Selective Trials: A Principal-Agent Approach to Randomized Controlled Experiments, in «American Economic Review», 102, 4, 2011.
-
Diversamente dai disegni contro-fattuali che provano a misurare il cambiamento con e senza l’intervento da valutare, per comprendere gli effetti della terza missione, occorre esplorare gli specifici percorsi degli impatti, osservando l’interazione tra interventi e contesti; cfr. cap. 8.
-
A. Milat, K. Lee e K. Conte, Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool: A Decision Support Tool for Health Policy Makers and Implementers, in «Health Research Policy Systems», 18, 1, 2020.
-
Ibidem.
-
Cfr. Challenges and Implications of Scale, Yale-Research on Innovation & Scale (Y-RISE), https://yrise.yale.edu/.
-
A. Banerjee, R. Banerji, J. Berry, E. Duflo, H. Kannan, S. Mukerji, M. Shotland e M. Walton, From Proof of Concept to Scalable Policies: Challenges and Solutions, with an Application, in «Journal of Economic Perspectives», 31, 4, 2017, pp. 73-102, http://economics.mit.edu/files/12359.
-
P. Milgrom e J. Roberts, The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization, in «American Economic Review», 80, 1990, pp. 511-528.
-
Dati Coinor, Università di Napoli, 2021 e informazioni basate su interviste semi-strutturate.
-
Istituto Giuseppe Toniolo, Rapporto Giovani, Bologna, Il Mulino, anni vari.
-
I benefici sono stati calcolati per una durata di due anni per coorte solo per una metà dei discenti (non iscritti ad altri corsi e non occupati) che seguono l’academy il primo anno e trovano un lavoro nel secondo.
-
Cebr, The Economic Impact of Basic Digital Skills and Inclusion in the UK, London, Tinder Foundation and GO ON UK, 2015. Cfr. anche J. Nicholls et al., A Guide to Social Return on Investment, London, Office of the Third Sector, Cabinet Office, 2009.
-
Dati Coinor, Università di Napoli, 2021.
-
E. Moretti, The New Geography of Jobs, Mariner Books, 2013; M. Goos, J. Konings e M. Vanderweyer, Local High-tech Job Multipliers in Europe, in «Industrial and Corporate Change», 27, 4, 2018, pp. 639-655; N. Lee e S. Clarke, Do Low-skilled Workers Gain from High-tech Employment Growth? High-technology Multipliers, Employment and Wages in Britain, in «Research Policy», 48, 9, 103803, 2019.
-
Goos, Konings e Vanderweyer, Local High-tech Job Multipliers in Europe, cit.
-
M.C. Morandini, A. Thum-Thysen e A. Vandeplas, Facing the Digital Transformation: Are Digital Skills Enough?, Economic Brief 054, Brussels, European Commission, 2020, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/economy-finance/eb054_en.pdf.
-
N. Heuer, The Effect of Occupation-Specific Brain Drain on Human Capital, University of Tübingen Working Papers in Economics and Finance n. 7, University of Tübingen, 2011.
-
Audretsch, Lehmann, Menter e Wirschin, Intrapreneurship and Absorptive Capacities, cit.
-
B. Van Ark, The Productivity Challenge: Jobs and Incomes in the Dawning Era of Intelligent Robots, Intervention at the Annual Research Conference 2018, European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/economyfinance/van_ark.pdf. Cfr. anche Morandini, Thum-Thysen e Vandeplas, Facing the Digital Transformation, cit.
-
E.E. Lehmann, M. Menter e K. Wirsching, Firm Performance and Regional Innovation Mechanisms: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacities, in «Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research», 37, 11, 2017, pp. 243-248.
-
P. Braunerhjelm, D. Ding e P. Thulin, The Knowledge Spillover Theory of Intrapreneurship, in «Small Business Economics», 51, 4, 2018, pp. 1-30.
-
Ibidem; Audretsch, Lehmann, Menter e Wirschin, Intrapreneurship and Absorptive Capacities, cit.
-
Cfr. anche OECD, Evaluation of the Academy for Smart Specialization. The Geography of Higher Education, Paris, 2020, https://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/Evaluation_Academy_Smart_Specialisation.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0n5qfZhw_btf5ExQ4mN8XNPWhoLztDTIUHHv_pCaHDunSWuJ6M853lgFk; A. Rodríguez-Pose, The Revenge of the Places That Don’t Matter (and What to Do about It),in «Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society», 11, 2018, pp. 189-209; S. Iammarino, A. Rodriguez-Pose e M. Storper, Regional Inequality in Europe: Evidence, Theory and Policy Implications, in «Journal of Economic Geography», 19, 2019, pp. 273-298; S. Iammarino, A. Rodriguez-Pose e M. Storper, Regional Inequality in Europe: Evidence, Theory and Policy Implications, in «Journal of Economic Geography», 19, 2019, pp. 273-298.
-
Ibidem; B. Clarysse, M. Wright, J. Bruneel e A. Mahajan, Creating Value in Ecosystems: Crossing the Chasm between Knowledge and Business Ecosystems, in «Research Policy», 43, 2014, pp. 1164-1176; C.W. Wessner e T.R. Howell, Regional Renaissance. How New York’s Capital Region Became a Nanotechnology Powerhouse, Springer, 2020.
-
E. Uyarra, Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions, in «European Planning Studies», 18, 8, 2010, pp. 1227-1246; P. Benneworth e L. Nieth, Universities and Regional Development in Peripheral Regions, Abingdon, Routledge, 2018.